The meeting of European agriculture ministers failed to convince all Member States to maintain funding of millions of free meals. Update on the issues of the blockage. The European aid to the poor to distribute free meals to some 13 million people in Europe.
It must have the meeting "last chance". However, on Tuesday in Brussels, the European Ministers of Agriculture have failed to agree on the future of food aid to the poor, previously levied on agricultural funds. Six countries of the European Union (EU) refused to hold it in the state, saying its operation denatured for many years.Associations, including the Red Cross and Restos du Coeur in France, fear serious consequences, which could be felt in 2012.
What is the European food aid?
In 1987, in the heart of the cold winter that pushed Coluche to open the "Restos du Coeur", the European Commission created the European program of aid to the poor (PEAD). Backed by the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), he plans to give to charity, today nearly 240 – the agricultural surplus of the member countries, then redistributed to the poor. Nineteen of the 27 EU states benefit now headed by Italy, Poland and France, for the preparation of some 13 million meals.
Since 1995, the surplus stocks are supplemented by a budget that allows you to run the program despite the fall in surplus.Between 1988 and 2008, its budget has risen from 97 to 300 million euros, reaching 500 million in 2009.
Why is the program being called into question today?
The current debate has in fact emerged in 2008. That year, "EU Commissioner has proposed to give a stronger legal basis to support plan by assigning two objectives: to reduce farm inventories, but also contribute to food security of the poor, with a social dimension" , said Nadège Chambon, researcher expert on the CAP for the think tank "Notre Europe". With this new legal base, the European Commission would have any legitimacy to buy food in the absence of surplus, or to expand the range of products supplied.
But the refusal of a handful of countries, including Germany, buried the project. These states were opposed to the feeding program is funded by the EU budget.In 2010, the current Commissioner for Agriculture, Dacian Ciolos, submitted an amended version. "It would increase the share of the envelopes of the EU, but also to open the co-financing private foundations, for example," says Nadège Chambon. The search for a compromise failed again today: Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Denmark and Sweden continue to oppose the text, forming again a minority of block which makes it impossible to vote.
What are the arguments of the opposing countries?
The strong position of these six countries is based on a jurisdictional issue. "In principle, assistance to the poor is good, but it is the duty of national states," said the German representative, the Secretary of State Robert Kloos, advocating that it be spring " national budgets and not the European agricultural budget. "In Germany, moreover, the associations are very few appeals to the European program, with emphasis on regional governments, municipalities and churches. (Read on the subject: Germany has does not (the restaurants) heart?)
In April, the Court of Justice of the European Union, seized by Germany, has proved him right, by canceling the article to fund the distribution of aid from the budget of the CAP.
And those of his supporters?
The European Commission is in turn firmly attached to the device. Members highlight the growing needs of the poor, still weakened by the recent rise in food prices."In 2006, an estimated 43 million people in the EU-25 were at risk of food poverty," she recalled in a discussion paper.
"The CAP has imposed tariff protection which may themselves have negative consequences on the food purchasing power of citizens. The European Union would have a real legitimacy to helping people by providing food aid to the poor" Nadège Chambon also observed.
Program funds be at risk in the short term?
Yes, largely. The decision of the Court of Justice already prevents the European Commission to use the budget of the CAP to fund the program in 2012, depriving him of more than 80% of its resources. Result, its funds could rise from 480 million euros this year to 113.5 million in 2012, since only the original part of the program, the distribution of the surplus can be maintained."The associations are likely to distribute 130 million meals in less than in 2012," responded Didier Piard, head of advocacy at the Red Cross.
Despite the determination of the Commission and the outrage of European public opinion, "I do not see many positive outcomes, both the position of countries who oppose the program seems strong," said Nadège Chambon. In anticipation of the forthcoming negotiations, the states in favor of maintaining the program should continue intense negotiations to bend the skeptics.